Hoods Off

Icon

Open Racism, Discrimination, and Hatred in America

Marxist perspective on Middle East struggles

Marxist perspective on Middle East struggles
Marxists call governments like those in Syria and Libya “bourgeois nationalist” — nationalist because they seek to develop their countries free from imperialist domination and bourgeois because they are ruled by an exploiting capitalist class.
Read more on Workers World

Latest Marxist News

Marxist Matrix of Occupy Protesters, Obama & George Soros: The Devil's Symphony?
We can hardly be blamed to see a connect when we detect a connecting, central motif—Marxism. The Occupy Protests are presented as the organic polar opposite of the Tea Party protests, arising of their own impetus as logically as weeds erupting in an
Read more on Canada Free Press

Reflections on Marxism
The publication of a work by Eric Hobsbawm, arguably the most celebrated Marxist historian of this generation, has always been an event. Original in method and provocative in ideas, his studies not only chartered a new path, but also ruffled the
Read more on The Hindu

How does both the Marxist and capitalist philosophical crisis get stimulus from the each other (Part-2 of 5)

How does both the Marxist and capitalist philosophical crisis get stimulus from the each other (Part-2 of 5).

Origin and zeal the society;

 

While presenting any theory of human beings in ancient period, it is common to see from the point of present conditions, under which the presenters views directly and indirectly influence by the way of living relations of the present period in which the productive forces and their relation with the new findings and inventions upon which all these views influences the views in the presentation of the past and remote history of the present society. It further leads into past from the point where he started presenting the findings about anything upon which the social relations and its active players take a lead role in further finding the new on the old one in any field

.

Darwinian Theory of common origin was proved wrong in many ways by the findings of other scientists in later years. The humans while living in caves and in the forest they did not have any tools for their lively hood. Later they found tools with stones, later they further, iron they used in their lives which have found some sort of security to their lives within the adjustments as substitutes, casual participations in the collection of the food

 

The new social order they formed for the interest of all the members of the group in which one who was secured the power of leading the others within the command of duties he assigned regular production work, security work, observational work, searching of the resources works, the chief had been alienated from the productive work field. In order to assign these widened avenues in which all most all with high risky to low and simple works all the members were accommodated according to the capability and the interest of the members. This was the situation where the changes through the new findings and making to learn the adjustments with each other on the needs of the group have been habituated

.

 In a progress and development of the living habits of the ancient humans there are at least five-seven branches have been originated during a small and short time of living from the caves and forest to the safety places for their living. In order of listing of the in findings on time line is not possible here because this kind of advancement and progress in a little time, it had taken thousands and millions of years.

1)      Alienation from the productive work to commanding work which is non productive in its nature.

2)       Casual work relief from the production work and the system of substitution in the work took place

3)      Security work in protecting the fellow humans in the community taken place.

4)      Service related and helping with learning to little were taken place.

5)      The relations on the options among the male and females were taken

How does both the Marxist and capitalist philosophical crisis get stimulus from the each other (Part4 of 5)

How does both the Marxist and capitalist philosophical crisis get stimulus from the each other (Part4 of 5)

 

Situational factors leads to organizational factors from individual to massive way was the real potential source of the society for its progress and its advancements from ancient to present capitalism in the world indifferently to all the states including India.

 

Tools in hands were deprived of by those wanted to keep the productive forced unite was the first step of the powerful lords who gained control over the people, resources, and its productions in the dwelling areas of the society. In essence, the initiation stage of the civilization in which the people were allowed to live in a common life with the women, children, and  the feeder as an unit of the family as its first freedom of leaving from the system of common dwelling in unity with the family who belonged to the blood relations of the lords

 

.The blood related males were the first alienated from the common living dwelling centers with their tools and belongings as a unit of their own family including their females, children, and some males who were thought to be useful for the practical purposes of securing the needs of the family. The very basic relaxation was at this alienation from the common dwelling centers were believes that they would never turn in hostilities against the first lords. The ‘trust’ was the basic requirement in allowing the blood related families which was the need at that time, with a view to help them in case of any dangers to either their lives the lords or to their resources by the enemies within the common dwelling centers or from the out side source including natural disasters like floods.

 

 The basic need of the newly alienating blood related lords was food, shelter, females, children, and some domesticated animals, like a dog, sheep, bull, and some metal tools within the same common dwelling centers. While alienating from the power of the lords the newly emerging blood related lords, they have made themselves as an another power center within common, dwelling habitations quite for some time as an adjustments for the purpose of the safely and guarantee that was the basic need of every one to live together under one common force which was controlled by the lords.

 

The alienation from power centre within same common dwelling units was firstly, as half in the way of independence within itself and in second way that was in physical and in complete physical by migrating to some other areas in accordance to the physical conditions of the areas which were mostly plane areas. The very nature of divisions of the were taken place in two way further more while the progress and advancement of the civilizations, at that time. These initial alienations from themselves were resulted the unending expansions of the migrations with tools, domestic animals,

How does both the Marxist and capitalist philosophical crisis get stimulus from the each other? (5 of 10)

How does both the Marxist and capitalist philosophical crisis get stimulus from the each other? (5 of 10)

How does play the role of the state in balancing from alienation to participation in the productive forces in the socialist state for winning the hearts of the common people and killing the adverts through its influential nearest of productive and non-productive forces on the name religion, region, welfare, democracy, socialism, and terrorism in the world, without sharing in the affairs of the state and leaving it free to rule in the hands of political parties in democratic and secular India and in all global states?

 

In the list of non-productive forces, religion occupied the first place from the ancient period; the Egyptian gods had their origin in nature. The belief of the people was and is the internal matter of every body in the world. The belief as an idea is a matter of the individual and how it was taken place in his mind and how it would be replaced with another belief is unanswerable question to anybody in the world. Belief, thought, and feelings of everybody could be identified with the acts of the same individuals in the society on a particular reactions or actions on few occasions that could be identified by everybody. But the sources all these beliefs, thoughts, and feelings could be identified through more than three to four ways that were taken place in the minds of the people in general and a person in particular.

 

Particular ideas of a bunch of the people could be identified with its available sources in any country and in any society. The history of the different regions in the world could be identified with the popular religions of past and present days in the world. There were the traditions and practices of the gods prior to the days of Abraham. After the Old Testament the ideas and traditions of the people were changed. The practices of the faith and the feeling on the creations of world were changed. And in later times, Jesus Christ, upon who’s preaching and practice all most the beliefs of the region were further changed in the place of old ideas in their minds in a massive way.

 

The ideas, beliefs, and thoughts are different from issue to issue, subject to subject, action to action, need to need, and to the time to time. So no idea of any individual is permanent and could never be expected on expected lines by anybody.

 

 However, the sources of ideas, thoughts and beliefs are concerned that the sources could be identified from childhood of any individual to the time of his death, from the surroundings at the early child hood of anybody, and the period of growth through the parents, teachers, and in the adult period friends and the society where he is a member. After finding the living source, while education, or after the education, the another new place would add to know about all that things what were he saw and

Media Marxist Outfit Free Press's Net Neutrality Lawsuit Wins Them 'Most Out

Media Marxist Outfit Free Press's Net Neutrality Lawsuit Wins Them 'Most Out
Less Government President and StopNetRegulation.org Editor in Chief Seton Motley issued the following statement in response to Media Marxist outfit Free Press's lawsuit – which absurdly claims the Federal Communications Commission (FCC)'s illegal
Read more on Pajamas Media

1936: The Battle of Cable Street
means of protection against the cancerous growth of Bolshevism” (Winston Churchill, speaking in Rome in January 1927) It is a great irony that the most intelligent representatives of the bourgeoisie often share the same analysis as the Marxists.
Read more on In Defense of Marxism (blog)

Allen West: Obama's a Marxist, and "I Need a Buc…

Allen West: Obama's a Marxist, and "I Need a Buc…
Allen West is back on the media circuit, this time declaring President Obama a "Marxist" and saying he'd "need a bucket" when Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz's name was brought up. Yesterday, West was a guest of the Michael Berry Show on a Houston AM
Read more on Broward-Palm Beach New Times (blog)

How conservatives unwittingly advance Marxism
Chalk that up as a big, forfeited victory for real revolutionaries tickled pink by the Right's unwitting validation of the long-standing Marxist claim that capitalism in global, systemic crisis becomes so beset by limiting contradictions that it can't
Read more on The People’s Voice

How does both the Marxist and capitalist philosophical crisis get stimulus from the each other (Part-1 of 5)

How does both the Marxist and capitalist philosophical crisis get stimulus from the each other (Part-1 of 5).

 

While making any statement by any individual or any philosopher about the things of present, past and about the up coming issues in future, they were very informative about those things upon which they wanted to speak something differently from the previous statements of others, very differently, to the people in any country through any way of the available sources. Hundreds of philosophers have told about the origin of the world and its laws of working in which the way of living of the people from ancient times to present. The language itself the people invented for their convenient to the ancient people who have given the new life to the people, through which they learnt from each other and continued their lives from the caves and forests to the habitations under the protective measures and finding the new needs according to the time demanded for implementations and inventions in the life of the primitive people.

 

Every human being have the work of feeding themselves wherever they lived with one another before forming the families and divisions from the groups to the individual based groups. While every step into the advancement from the old to new there must be a lead of any one or two who were held responsible for every such step. And at the same time in the absence of implements in helping their day to day lives they were helpful with each other and dependable upon the other individuals of the society,

 

The collective idea and living together as a primitive society in ancient times was based on the theories and ideas of many anthropologists and social philosophers including Engel, in the similar way of the living nature of the humanoids, apes and champagnes only. But it is a fact that it is an idea, and an opinion based of the evidences of the living nature of the animals that have some additions to the evidences what they could produce in support of the claim at the time the presentation of their ideas which may be true, or partial true, and not true. These ideas or opinions if related to the up-coming events in future, the people call them fortune tellers, palmist or foretellers. They have their place in the present society and they lives as usually whatever the way they like to live, for which no body could have objection about them

 

. Because they people those who believe them, would approach them and give some tip or whatever a gift on the demand or their will the action of telling about the future of individual who attended him and receiving it the present or gift have been completed. Here why was the individual approached to him to know about the future and why the foreteller did was opted to work of foretelling without participation in the work of the production in any way is not a question to the entire society of any time and the

WHO IS THE TRUE MARXIST ? MAMATA OR BUDDHADEB?

I am sitting here flabberghasted for the last one or two hours. Pondering over a puzzle I am sitting here flabberghasted with my fingers crossed. Could you help you?

 

Nowadays I think too much of West Bengal and the Left Front Government which is desperately fighting bitter battle against the Maoists. While writing this it has somewhat managed to rein in their “erstwhile comrades” now “comrades in arms” for about a fortnight shedding much bloodshed resulting in loss of lives. Innocent tribals who were in no way connected with any of the political outfits had to bear the brunt most.

 

First Nandigram, then comes Singur and the latest Lalgarh imbroglio – one after another the Government finds itself in a quandary and tries to wriggle out of  this piquant situation.

 

Adding insult to injury, in the elections to the local self-governing institutions, the Trinamool-Congress combine have virtually swept 13 out of 16 which was the worst ever drubbing for the CPI(M) combine since it was badly mauled in the Loksabha elections of 2009.

 

Shock after shock in the form of Parliament elections, local-self governing institutions and political-turmoil. With Mamata Banerji set to cash in on each crises with much finesse.

 

The CPI(M) and its constituents seek us to believe that she is an imperialist pawn out to throw the Left Front government never can I believe such a nonsense though I have a leftist bent of mind. Mamata Banerji cannot be bracketed with the imperialist forces at any cost.

 

A politician who is known for her simple way of life unlike the  present-day politicians, both right and left, who are after pomp and pageantry, worldly pleasures, plum seats in the corridors of power – among them how such a person be a tool in the hands of imperialist forces? Never .

]]>

 

Casting this aspersion on her will entail in the form of a rebound effect on her detractors whether it be CPI(M) or any other political party for that matter.

 

Her love for Bengal is well-known and her empathetic approach to the Bengalese especially the most deprived lot are there for everyone to see and appreciate The Most defining example is the Railway Budget she presented in Parliament two days back. It reflects her caring attitude and her determination to do her bit for the uplift of the down-trodden.Her special consideration for the unorganized workers in her budget comprising all over India is really heart-warming.

 

Similarly her intervention in Singur and Nandigram.

The Marxist government of West Bengal which always claim to be the champion of masses, when forcefully evacuated the peasants of Nandigram and Singur – for the construction of a chemical hub in Nandigram by a multinational group and similar

Lipstick on a Marxist Does not Work Either

This week, Senator Barack Obama used a common colloquialism to refer to the policies of the Bush Administration and of Republican presidential candidate John McCain who will continue on with most of them. He said that you can put lipstick on a pig, but it is still a pig. It is entirely interesting however that Obama would choose such a saying. Especially on the heels of Sarah Palin’s comments at the Republican convention mentioning that there is only one difference between a hockey mom and a pit bull – that difference being only lipstick. Couple that with the fact that Obama associates and former sixties radicals (who are still radicals today) often refer to members of the establishment (such as police) as “pigs”.

It will go down as one of those comments that will be hotly debated as to exactly what Obama meant. Was it just an ill timed remark given the recent joke by Palin? Or was it a deliberate jab at the Republican vice-presidential candidate? And whether he was referring to Palin as the “pig” or just the lipstick that is being used to sex up said pig, as is now being claimed by the left, does it really matter? Because either one is insulting.

I personally do not care which he meant. With Obama, what comes out of his mouth are “just words” that he rarely means anyway. Rather I care to address the assertion in general of referring to the poor policies and bad ideas as pigs wearing lipstick.

Now, anyone that reads my weekly articles or my daily blog posts knows darn well that I have taken President Bush out to the woodshed and whipped him from time to time when he has done things that are wrong. Off the top of my head I remember his blind willingness to sign Campaign Finance Reform with it’s unconstitutional wording plain for all to see, his support for amnesty for criminal aliens and most recently his stubborn willingness to chuck free market ideas and bailout people who loaned more money than they should to people they should not have loaned money to and those that took out loans they could not reasonably be prepared to actually pay back. People who regularly read my writings know that I am not a McCain supporter either and constantly deride the candidate as not being a real reformer when it comes to the worst violations of our Constitution and rampant spending. And while I do like Palin more than most members of the Republican Party, she is not without her own flaws either. And to be quite honest no one has had time to fully vet her.

]]>

So even though on a weekly basis I get the standard emails from those that think I am some sort of Republican Party hack, my track record is quite clear and available for all to see. Indeed, some of this current administration’s policies are just pigs with lipstick on trying to convince us to kiss them. I admit it. Of course for

Cloud